In the bringing of a new coming work with references to how our image
production, circulation of information and virtual presence is all on
the hands of algorithmic governance, I decided to ask few close scholars
to come to a dialogue with me on the status of an image in contemporary
times and to comment on my take on its undefined borders. As I am
scripting the role of cameras as the core of this coming work, I
registered ‘The Dialogue’ by a camera on a dolly, testing its abilities
towards the perception of the viewer, its time and staging. While
withdrawing slowly myself from the position of control, I am turning my
back to the lens and its camera operator having instructed him through a
series of drawings and by placing marks on the role of the camera and
its role in ‘The Dialogue’. Choices as my virtual entity ‘in presence’
as well as the long monologue at the first part of ‘The Dialogue’ are
pointing to a threshold of presence in future society and its relation
to a dialogic telematic society.
‘The Dialogue’ script and content has all come through this one off
registration in a live discourse together with:
Knut Åsdam: filmmaker, installation artist, sculptor,
photographer, and writer exploring contemporary society and its
psychological and material effects
Andrew Fremont-Smith: artist and theorist, working with
time based media and performance forms, leading workshops on Lacan
theory and structuralism in radical political theory
Jennifer Uleman: associate
professor of Philosophy at Purchase College; her thought and writing are
grounded in German Idealism.
Andreas Wimmer: lieber professor of Sociology and
Political Philosophy at Columbia University, asks how states are built
and nations formed, how individuals draw ethnic and racial
boundaries, and when inequality, conflicts, or armed violence may result
from both.
director’s bio
Maria Lalou (1977, Athens-Greece) explores the topic of ‘viewing’
throughout her large-scale installations, performances, and
publications. Focusing on the topic of viewing, she incorporates
cinematic apparatus and surveillance as part of her tools, with central
references to ‘the political of the viewer’.
Each of her works formulates a precise frame often in the form of a
distilled, almost lab-like setting. In her native Greek language, she
states: as spectator, one becomes ‘theoros’ in the sense that one
observes, participates and interprets the performative process from a
certain perspective while this is part of the performance’s ontology.
After 15 years being active in the visual arts with her clear stand
point on ‘nonexistence of representation’, Lalou makes her first attempt
to deliver a statement through a feature film by the document of a
discursive dialogue on the image production, its role in contemporary
times and its relation to cinematic time; by staging and recording a
real time dialogue between herself and four scholars, with ground the
speculative society in New York.